ZIONISM and the HOLOCAUST
(Investigator 118, 2008 January
The publicity afforded Dr Frederick Toben's 40 Days in Teheran in the columns of the Adelaide Review
brings to public attention, yet again, the vague half-truths and myths
that have unfortunately become part of 20th Century history (among
other things, Toben claims Zyklon B gas was used only for 'delousing'
in Auschwitz and "Jews were transferred, with Zionist collaboration, to
Palestine with their property, while others were moved out of German
territory, and Auschwitz was a transit camp"!)
Ironically, although often not fully appreciated, the major objective
of the world Zionist movement was not in conflict with Hitler's racist
policies. Founded in the late 19th Century, Herzl's Zionism was a
religio/political movement seeking a 'national' (sic) homeland for all
Jews – specifically situated in the Biblical 'land of Israel'.
In their 'early days', the Nazis anti-Jewish policies aimed at
excluding Jews from the national community, but the Reich's expansion
in the wake of their conquering armies meant large numbers of Jews were
'acquired'; emigration on the scale now required presented a problem —
not helped by the British navy in the Mediterranean returning refugee
ships to Germany. As late as December 1944, Lord Gort, British High
Commissioner to Palestine cabled the Foreign Office to ask for Soviet
troops to close the Romanian and Bulgarian borders to halt the
increasing flow of Jewish refugees fleeing their Nazi persecutors.
Enough time has passed for a more sober exploration of what was
happening "behind the scenes" during the Holocaust years. The comments
that follow are a brief indication of areas where researchers should
more thoroughly explore…
Arguably, no-one played a more active role in the mass murders
perpetuated against European Jewry than Adolf Eichmann; what is not
remembered is that throughout his career in the Nazi hierarchy,
Eichmann, who visited British Palestine in 1937 as a representative of
the Reich government, made no secret of the fact that his views on the
Jewish question were frighteningly similar to those of world-wide
Zionism. Eichmann, a student of Judaism, familiar with the Hebrew
language and culture, recognized the identity of the geo-political
views of the German National Socialist Party and the Zionist policy.
Soon after the appointment of Hitler as Chancellor, on June 21 1933, the German Zionist Federation wrote to the Nazi government:
"On the foundation of
the new state, which has established the principle of race, we wish so
to fit in our community into the total structure so that for us too, in
the sphere assigned to us, fruitful activity for the fatherland is
possible … Zionism hopes to be able to win the collaboration even of a
government fundamentally hostile to Jews". (1)
On January 28 1935, Reinhard Heydrich, the 'real engineer of the final solution', issued a directive stating:
"The activity of the
Zionist-orientated youth organisations … lies in the interest of the
National Socialist state's leadership … [these organisations] are not
to be treated with the strictness that it is necessary to apply to the
members of the so-called German Jewish organisations
(assimilationists)." (2)
In April 1935 Heydrich issued another directive advocating the harassment of the non-Zionist German Jewish organizations; resultingly, Zionist groups were the only ones of a political nature that were allowed to continue functioning in Germany.
On May 15 1935, Schwarze Korps, official newspaper of the SS, argued that:
"The Zionists adhere to
a strict racial position and by emigrating to Palestine are helping to
build their own Jewish state... The assimilation-minded Jews deny their
race and insist on their loyalty to Germany ... in order to subvert National Socialist principles." (3)
In her book, Eichmann in Jerusalem
(1994), Hannah Arendt pointed out, "It is indisputable that during the
first stages of their Jewish policy, the National Socialists thought it
proper to adopt a pro-Zionist attitude." The book caused outrage
in the Zionist movement. Her crime was to shine a light on events
that the Eichmann trial had been designed to bury. A campaign of smears
and disinformation against Arendt began — as she herself reports:
"Even before its
publication, this book became both the centre of a controversy and the
object of an organised campaign... The clamour centred on the 'image'
of a book which was never written … I allegedly had claimed that the
Jews had murdered themselves. And why had I told such a monstrously
implausible lie? Out of 'self-hatred', of course." (4)
On September 15 1935, the Nuremburg laws, "the most murderous
legislative instrument known to European history", were enacted,
depriving German Jews of their citizenship and forbidding sexual
relations between Jews and Aryans. The introduction to the Nuremburg laws stated:
"The least amount of opposition to the underlying ideas of the
Nuremburg laws has been raised by the Zionists, because they know at
once that these laws represent the only correct solution for the Jewish
people as well." (5)
Arendt noted in the Eichmann trial that "there certainly was something
breathtaking in the naivety with which the prosecution denounced the
infamous Nuremberg laws of 1935, which had prohibited intermarriage and
sexual intercourse between Jews and Germans, [since] Israeli
citizens…seem agreed upon the desirability of having a law which
prohibits intermarriage."
Domicile-Transfer agreements
At a time when Jews, trade unionists and anti-fascists were launching a worldwide economic boycott of Nazi Germany, the World Zionist Organisation
was secretly negotiating an economic agreement which allowed richer
German Jews to liquidate their property in Germany and redeem part of
the money in Palestine. This agreement was announced by the Nazis
shortly before the 18th Zionist congress in Prague, in September 1933.
The Jewish Chronicle reported:
"The spectacle is puzzling to the world, whose sympathy we bespeak, and
disheartening to Jews for whom the boycott is one of the few weapons to
their hand and who now see themselves deserted by the movement which
they most have a right to claim as an ally in their fight."
Some 60% of all capital invested in the settler economy in Palestine between 1933 and 1939 came from Nazi Germany! By June 1937, the largest exporter to Palestine was Germany. As Baruch Vladeck, chairman of the Jewish Labor Committee in the USA described it, Palestine had become "the official scab-agent against the boycott in the Near East". (6)
However, there were some boycotts that the Zionists did support.
In 1941 Agudat Yisrael began sending food packages to the inhabitants
of the ghettos in Poland. In July the AJC and the Zionist Organisation
of America began picketing their offices. It is estimated that 25% of
the Warsaw ghetto and 18% of the Lódz ghetto died from hunger
and disease even before the deportations began.
The Judenräte
Everywhere the Nazis conquered, "the most important concentration
measure prior to the formation of the ghettos was the establishment of
Jewish councils (Judenräte)."
As Eichmann commented, "The assimilated Jew was, of course, very
unhappy about being moved to a ghetto. But the orthodox were pleased
with the arrangement, as were the Zionists." Some two-thirds of
the Judenräte consisted of Zionist supporters.
There were three stages to the 'final solution' — concentration in ghettos, deportation to the east and extermination. Everywhere there were functioning Judenräte, the Nazis were successful in their plans. The Prague Community Council was to provide the model for the Judenräte,
which in the towns of Poland and Russia in 1941-43 registered the names
of their flock, brought them to the assembly place, and eventually
followed them to the execution pits and death camps. The Judenräte
were reviled by the Jewish population and with good reason. The Nazis
insisted "the authority of the Jewish council be upheld and
strengthened under all circumstances" (7)
Unable to fulfil their welfare function, "they made themselves felt all
the more in their implementation of Nazi decrees. With the growth of
the destructive function of the Judenräte,
many Jewish leaders felt an almost irresistible urge to look like their
German masters." A Nazi observer in Kraków in March 1940 "was
struck by the contrast between poverty and filth in the Jewish quarter
and the businesslike luxury of the Jewish community headquarters." In
Warsaw, "the Jewish oligarchy took to wearing boots" (8). In
Lódz, Rumkowski had his portrait put on ghetto stamps and
currency.
Arendt's conclusion provoked outrage among the Zionists: "The whole
truth was that if the Jewish people had really been unorganised and
leaderless, there would have been chaos and plenty of misery, but the
total number of victims would hardly have been between four and a half
and six million people." After all, the Jewish Councils had been created by the Germans for the sole purpose of destroying the Jews …
Selectivity & Holocaust "Denial"
The Zionists negotiated with the SS to secure facilities to train their
pioneers in Europe and then bring them to Palestine. The 'rescue
activities' of the Zionist movement were concentrated on saving the
elite of their own organisations in Europe. Henry Montor,
executive vice-president of the United Jewish Appeal
explained: "By 'selectivity' is meant the choice of young men and women
who are trained in Europe for productive purposes either in agriculture
or industry and who are in other ways trained for life in Palestine...
There could be no more deadly ammunition provided to the enemies of
Zionism...if Palestine were to be flooded with very old people or with
undesirables… Until the resources of Palestine are adequately
developed, immigration of 30,000 to 60,000 a year may be possible." (9)
Selectivity was the explicit policy of the Zionist movement, as Chaim
Cohen, attorney general confirmed, when conducting the appeal of
Rudolph Kastner (see below):
"If in Kastner's
opinion, rightly or wrongly, he believed that one million Jews were
hopelessly doomed, he was allowed not to inform them of their fate; and
to concentrate on the saving of the few. He was entitled to make a deal
with the Nazis for the saving of a few hundred and entitled not to warn
the millions ... It has always been our Zionist tradition to select the
few out of many in arranging the immigration to Palestine ... Are we to
be called traitors?" (10)
Why did all wings of the Zionist movement play down reports of annihilation and obstruct the rescue efforts of others?
Nathan Schwalb, Hehalutz representative in Switzer-land, provided one
explanation, in a letter to Rabbi Michael Weissmandel in late 1942:
"After the victory [of
the Allies], they will once again divide up the world between the
nations, as they did at the end of the first war … we must be aware
that all the nations of the Allies are spilling much blood and if we do
not bring sacrifices, with what will we achieve the right to sit at the
table when they make the distribution of nations' territories after the
war? ... … only through blood will the land be ours." (11)
There was no more determined opponent of 'refugeeism', as it was termed, than Ben-Gurion:
"… are we again, in moments of desperation, going to confuse Zionism with refugeeism, which is likely to defeat Zionism ... Zionism
is not a refugee movement. It is not a product of the second World War,
nor of the first. Were there no displaced Jews in Europe ... Zionism
would still be an imperative necessity."(12)
In a letter December 17 1938 to the Zionist Executive, Ben-Gurion explained:
"…if the Jews are
faced with a choice between the refugee problem and rescuing Jews from
concentration camps on the one hand, and aid for the national museum in
Palestine on the other, the Jewish sense of pity will prevail and our
people's entire strength will be directed at aid for the refugees in
the various countries. Zionism will vanish from the agenda and … also
from Jewish public opinion. We are risking Zionism's very existence if
we allow the refugee problem to be separated from the Palestine
problem." (13)
Describing a press conference he gave on his return from the USA,
"Ben-Gurion dwelt at length and replied to questions on the following
topics: America in general and American Jewry in particular,
anti-semitism in America, the Biltmore Plan … As for the holocaust -
not a word. Nothing was said, nothing was asked; the subject was simply
not on the agenda." (14)
Because the Nazis did not occupy Hungary until March 1944, the country
became an island of safety in an ocean of destruction for about a third
of a million Jews from neighbouring countries. On April 17 1944 the
Hungarian regent, Miklós Horthy, visited Hitler to discuss
Hungary's role in the war. Hitler 'regretted' Hungary's Jewish policy, the one country in German-occupied Europe with a major Jewish community left untouched by the holocaust.
It was the only Axis country to send Jewish troops to the eastern
front, accounting for reports that the Hungarian army had stopped an
action by local police against the Jews and that Einsatzgruppe paramilitaries had cleared an area of Jews "except for a small area occupied by Hungarian forces." (15)
Some three-quarter million Jews were living in Hungary when Adolf
Eichmann and 300 Gestapo men arrived on March 15 1944. The same evening
Eichmann summoned the Jewish leaders to a conference to persuade them
to form a Judenrat.
This was a time when, according to the papal nuncio, "the whole world
knew what deportation meant in practice."(16)
The Nazis also formed a 'rescue committee' whose de facto
leader was Rudolph Kasztner of the minority Mapai (Labour Party)
faction amongst the Zionists. When they met the Zionists, Eichmann did
not try to lie or deceive as to the fate of the deportees. However, the
Zionists were allowed greater privileges than those normally accorded
members of a Judenrat: they
were free to come and go, practically as they pleased, and exempt from
wearing the yellow star and received permits to visit concentration
camps in Hungary. Kasztner, himself, could freely travel about Nazi
Germany without identification papers indicating he was Jewish!
The bargain that Kasztner and Eichmann struck resulted in a train
carrying 1,684 members of the Zionist elite going to Switzerland.
Eichmann also offered to send 15,000-18,000 Jews to Vienna to be kept
on ice (auf Eis gelegt)
pending negotiations with the Allies. These Jews were actually sent to
the Vienna-Strasshof concentration camp. It was only the Nazis'
military collapse that prevented the women and children being subject
to 'special treatment'.
Rudolph Vrba, who escaped from Auschwitz five weeks before the deportation of Hungary's Jews, wrote in the Daily Herald in February 1961:
"I accuse certain
Jewish leaders of one of the most ghastly deeds of the war. This small
group of quislings knew what was happening to their brethren in
Hitler's gas chambers and bought their own lives with the price of
silence. Among them was Dr Kastner … I was able to give Hungarian
Zionist leaders three weeks notice that Eichmann planned to send a
million of their Jews to his gas chambers … Kasztner went to Eichmann
and told him, 'I know of your plans; spare some Jews of my choice and I
shall keep quiet.' Eichmann not only agreed, but dressed Kasztner up in SS uniform and took him to Belsen to trace some of his friends." (17)
Even Hungary's Zionist chief rabbi Freudiger admitted that half the
Jews could have been saved if they had ignored the instructions of the
Jewish councils. He also admitted that he received the Vrba report
about Auschwitz on May 10/11 and immediately arranged his own escape.
Unfortunately the rest of Hungarian Jewry was not let in on the
secret. Eichmann described his relationship
with the Zionists in an interview he gave to a Dutch Nazi journalist,
Willem Sassens, in 1955:
"This Dr Kasztner …
agreed to help keep the Jews from resisting deportation - and even keep
order in the collection camps - if I would close my eyes and let a few
hundred or a few thousand young Jews emigrate illegally to Palestine.
It was a good bargain. For keeping order in the camps, the price of
15,000 or 20,000 Jews … was not too high for me ... With his great
polish and reserve he would have made an ideal Gestapo officer himself.
"Dr Kasztner's main
concern was to make it possible for a select group of Hungarian Jews to
emigrate to Israel ... As a matter of fact, there was a very strong
similarity between our attitudes in the SS and the viewpoint of these
immensely idealistic Zionist leaders …
"I believe that Kasztner would have sacrificed a
thousand or a hundred thousand of his blood to achieve his political
goal. He was not interested in old Jews or those who had become
assimilated into Hungarian society. But he was incredibly persistent in
trying to save biologically valuable Jewish blood - that is, human
material that was capable of reproduction and hard work. 'You can have
the others,' he would say, 'but let me have this group here.' And
because Kasztner rendered us a great service by helping keep the
deportation camps peaceful, I would let his groups escape." (18)
Kasztner went to Nuremberg after the war in an attempt to exonerate
Nazi leaders, including SS colonel Kurt Becher and SS general Hans
Juttner. In all Kasztner tried to save seven of Eichmann's Gestapo
colleagues. In his trial, Kasztner even alleged Himmler had helped him
save Jews.
The Eichmann trial in 1961 was a response to the Kasztner trials. Thus
began the Zionist attempt to mould the history of the holocaust into a
Zionist pattern. Missing from history would be the anti-Zionist Bund
and the communists, the two largest parties of the resistance. The Bund
had led the resistance in Warsaw but Marek Edelman, deputy commander of
ZOB, the Jewish Fighting Organisation,
was deliberately not called to give evidence at the trial. As Linn
notes, Edelman "remained alive and kicking and refusing and, therefore,
extremely inconvenient for the creation of a heroic Zionist condensing
and compensating myth". (19) Neither was Rudolph Vrba called. He was
not a Zionist.
History is never as 'black and white' as we would like it to be. But so
long as we are content to not research it properly, we make it all the
easier for the Frederick Tobens and the David Irvings to claim or imply
the Holocaust never happened!
Bob Potter
Bibliography
(1) Reitlinger The Final Solution (1953) p 13
(2) Ibid p 240
(3) Dawidowicz The War Against the Jews (1985) p118
(4) Arendt Eichmann in Jerusalem (1994) p58
(5) Reitlinger op cit p13
(6) Brenner 51 Documents (2002) p93
(7) Reitlinger op cit p299
(8) Hilberg The Destruction of European Jews (1985) pp 76-77
(9) Hecht Perfidy (1961) p255
(10) Hecht op cit in 7 p255
(11) Schonfield Documents & Testimony on Jewish War Criminals (1977) pp 27-28
(12) New York Times 27/4/46 Symposiun at 49th Annual Zionist Org of America org by Maariv
(13) Elam Intro. To Zionist History (1972) pp 125-26.
(14) Lucas Modern History of Israel (1975) fn 2 p458
(15) Hilberg op cit p116
(16) Reitlinger op cit p 420
(17) Hecht op cit p 261 n 68
(18) Brenner op cit pp 280-81
(19) See The Ghetto fights Bookmarks Sept 1990/Linn Escaping Auschwitz (2004) p 28.