THE HYRAX SUPPORTS THE BIBLE! (Revised from
Investigator 18, 1991
May)
Hyrax syriacus or "rock badger" is a rabbit-sized animal living in mountains among caves and rocks. It has also been called "rock rabbit", "shaphan" and "coney". Moses called the Hyrax a "chewer of the cud". (Leviticus 11:5; Deuteronomy 14:7) Everyone, however, seemed to disagree: "they do not actually chew the cud". These quotations
are from
theological sources.
However, the theologians relied on what seemed to be an established
scientific
finding. Nineteenth-century biologists had dissected the Hyrax and
showed
it had two stomach compartments and not the four compartments of
cud-chewing
ruminants such as cattle and sheep.
If the Bible is wrong in mundane testable points, then its untestable statements – especially important claims – would also be dubious. A principle Jesus gave is relevant: "He who is faithful in a very little is faithful also in much; and he who is dishonest in very little is dishonest also in much." (Luke 16:10) The Biological
Abstracts
are thick volumes
containing tens-of-thousands of concise summaries of biological
research
done throughout the world. Abstract 72891 for 1967 says:
"Order Hyracoidea" is the scientific name of a category of animals that includes the Hyrax. The full report, including photos of the Hyrax, appeared in the German journal Biologisches Zentralblatt. (1965 Nov-Dec pp. 671-751)
In 1964 zoologist Hubert Hendrichs observed hyraxes at the Munich zoo in Germany and noticed swallowing movements. He subsequently investigated more closely. Hendrichs discussed hyraxes on pages 736 to 739 of his report. He admitted that Moses anticipated his discovery by 3000 years. The reason the
Hyrax's
cud chewing behavior
remained unconfirmed so long is that the animal chews cud as little as
30 minutes a day and usually at night. Unless hyraxes are held in
captivity
their cud chewing would not be noticed!
So the Bible turns out right regarding an observation on the Hyrax and people who disagreed turned out wrong – so what? One isolated
case of the
Bible being proved
right and people disagreeing with it proved wrong would not be
significant.
But what if it happened often? What if there are hundreds of examples
in
many areas of study including astronomy, futurology, geography,
history,
biology, psychology, oceanography, geology, medicine, etc?
A book that
seems wrong
in hundreds of points
but always seems to turn out correct in the long run would be a
peculiar
book indeed. Could any human write such a book? (A)
Hundreds
of investigations into the
accuracy of the Bible on this website:
|