Below are three items on child abuse and the Bible
ANGLICANS IGNORED THE BIBLE
Anonymous
(Investigator 83, 2002 March)
On Australian Story (Channel 2, February 18) the
Governor-General — formerly the Anglican Archbishop of Brisbane — seemed to
condone an incident in which a married priest, aged 27, had sex with a
14-year-old girl.
Explaining in the interview why the priest was not dismissed Dr Peter
Hollingworth said, "My belief is that this was not sex abuse, there was
no suggestion of rape, or anything like that, quite the contrary. My
information is that it was the other way around…"
The incident occurred 40 years ago in a church-run hostel.
Dr Hollingworth's statement implied the girl had been a willing
participant — even a predatory female — and he supported his claim by
stating that as adults the girl and priest resumed a relationship.
(Apparently it resumed when the woman sought counselling for
depression.)
Australia-wide criticism followed Dr Hollingworth's remarks since by
definition an adult having sex with an under-aged girl commits child
abuse. West Australian Premier Geoff Gallop, for example, said Dr
Hollingworth should resign.
In the furore over this issue I've not seen anyone stating what the Bible says, which is:
"But now I am writing to you not to associate with anyone who bears the
name of brother or sister who is sexually immoral… Do not even eat with
such a one… Drive out the wicked person among you." (1
Corinthians 5:9-13)
The Bible also teaches that in the last judgment "fornicators" (persons
who practice pre-marital sex) get the same punishment as murderers.
(Revelation 21:8) Nor is this unfair. In the article The Bible, Science
and Sex Relationships (#48) I showed that immoral conduct causes more
devastation than all wars combined — even in the 20th century when we had
antibiotics!
The Biblical answer, then, is that the fornicating priest should have been dismissed.
Furthermore, the Bible tells Christians to obey the secular authorities
whenever God's commands are not compromised. Since a 14-year-old is
under the legal age of consent the priest should have been reported to
the police.
Had Anglican leaders followed the Bible – the textbook which as
"Christians" they're obliged to follow - Dr Hollingworth might now be
Governor-General without embarrassment.
Anonymous—SA
SEX, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL AND THE BIBLE
John H. Williams
(Investigator 84, 2002 May)
I write in response to Anonymous' letter in #83, regarding our Gov'r
General.
As I write (7/3), Dr Hollingworth is still in office, but the
controversy seems likely to continue.
I agree with Anonymous' presentation of the case's facts, but not his
interpretation. Not for the first time, I express distaste for his
judgemental and moralistic views which he supports with the selective
use of Biblical quotations. Obviously, the reason he has "not seen
anyone stating what the Bible says" is because the Australian public is
assessing the issue in a secular way, realising the futility, and the
wrongness, of using the Bible in a literal manner to damn wrong doers.
The priest who had sex with the 14-year-old girl ought, to have been
dismissed and reported to the police for the offence of carnal
knowledge. Whatever the Bible says — and it says many somewhat
conflicting things, for example the wide disparity between the views of
Jesus and Paul — is irrelevant because we have laws. We've moved some way
from ancient prejudices and crude punitive customs. One supposes that a
truly Christian system would include compassion, tolerance and some
forgiveness, a bit lacking in those of the 'eye for an eye' school.
The crime was serious and a significant punishment, after
mitigation,
would have occurred. Having 'avoided' the sentence, by committing a
'mortal sin', some would imagine that, for 'him', Hell's flames would
be doubly hot.
I've looked at Revelation 21:8. My King James says: "But the fearful,
and unbelieving, and the abominable (yetis?), and murderers, and
whoremongers…and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which
burneth with fire and brimstone; which is the second death." A bit hard
on scared skeptics and fibbers, one would think, but it’s just another
wildly apocalyptic warning of those longed for end times when all would
be judged.
Also, just like other species, we die, and the 'let's scare people into
believing' 'second death' in the bowels of an active volcano ('Hell')
is but a figment of literalists'/fundamentalists' fervid imagination.
Of course, the self righteous have the 'extra insurance' of facing up
to Judgement day with a clean sheet, so they believe that the part of
them that remains extant after the "dust to dust" bit will be 'saved'.
Anonymous mentioned an article he once wrote (in #48) which "showed
that immoral conduct causes more devastation than all wars combined".
Since I strongly disagree with this, I believe that he ought to have
used the words 'attempted to show', since the selected data to 'prove'
something about which he clearly has a powerful bee in his moralistic
bonnet, so his figures and thus his thesis are highly suspect.
Anonymous persists in propagating a mis truth, that the Bible is a
'textbook' with a particular teaching purpose, when even the non
expert can see the inconsistencies, as well as the folly of a mind set
that applies apparently 'God-given' (which assumes one exists) ancient
rules and 'laws' to contemporary issues.
CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE & RELIGION
Anonymous
(Investigator 85, 2002 July)
"Let the little children come to me and do not stop them;
for it is to such as these that the kingdom of heaven belongs." (Matthew 19:14)
GUILTY RELIGIONS
The problem of child sexual abuse by clergy sprang to world attention
this year (2002) with the televising of the sentencing of a priest who
abused 130 boys during 30 years. The priest's bishop, had reassigned
the priest to parish after parish after each abuse became known and
silenced the victims with bribes.
Many churches have a history of sexual abuse of children and of denial regarding its occurrence:
Australia: About 100 Catholic and Anglican clergy convicted of child
sex abuse in the past five years. In Queensland one victim received
$830,000 compensation from the Anglican Church and dozens more are
suing.
Canada: Several Anglican dioceses went bankrupt and closed down due to
compensation payments. Over 2,000 compensation claims have been filed
by Indians alone.
England: Twenty-one priests convicted in the past 7 years.
Ireland: Irish taxpayers are contributing 1/5 of $500 million to pay off claims by 3,000 victims covering 30 years.
USA: About 2000 Catholic priests have been disgraced including about
1200 legal proceedings. The Church has paid $1000 million in 17 years on
court settlements, lawyers, hush-money and treatment (US$350 per day)
for pervert priests.
In April, 2002, there were hundreds of priestly resignations, firings
and settlements in dozens of countries and the Pope called American
Cardinals to the Vatican to organise a policy change.
Child sexual abuse is also endemic in fringe religions. In America 44
students of seven Hare Krishna boarding schools filed a $A675 million
lawsuit for child abuse in America and India. The abuse started in 1972
at the cult's first school in Dallas and allegedly eventually affected
1,000 children. (Herald Sun, June 14, 2000 p.43) The cult has since
filed for bankruptcy.
Christianity Today (March 5, 2001) interviewed Jehovah's Witness abuse victims and added:
Witness spokesman Brown says that the incidence of paedophilia is no
worse in his religion than in others, but he admits that some elders
have not reported suspicions of abuse…
Jim Whitney, 49, formerly a Witness elder says… "Pedophiles know that
any confession they make is concealed. The Witnesses don't want to
bring shame to their name."
The Coloradoan (February 11, 2001) reported on a JW elder facing
excommunication for demanding that church leaders acknowledge
complaints of abuse victims.
CHILD ABUSE IN SOCIETY
Child sexual abuse in the community vastly exceeds the abuse by
ministers of religion. Community awareness started in the late 1970s
due to TV discussions and stories in women's magazines.
Freda Briggs, consultant for the Victoria Police, said in 1985:
In most Western societies, it has become an endemic problem…one in four
girls and one in nine boys in the US are sexually abused by adults
before the age of 18…
Recently we read of a teacher who boasted of abusing 2000 boys…yet the
judge released him on a five-year bond commenting, according to the
Press report, that the boys had "probably enjoyed the sex acts."
Defending lawyers often accuse children of lying or behaving
seductively… They expect children to fight their abusers, not taking
account of the disparity in size, weight, authority…
But law courses deal with intricacies of law rather than the norms of
child development and the victim is victimised again in the legal
process. (Briggs 1985)
A 1987 study of 104 cases of kids assessed for abuse in hospital and
which went to court: "only five resulted in conviction and these
abusers received good-behaviour bonds or suspended sentences." (Haynes,
1995)
What about child abuse in the Muslim world? Burns (1994) writes:
When one considers the Qur'anic punishments against fornication and
adultery, one would think that promiscuity and sex crime in Islam would
be minimal. However rape and child abuse are not, in most cases,
reported. The reason is that the "victim is blamed": a stigma is
attached to having been defiled. For example a study into sexual
aggression by grown up men on female children or young girls showed
that nearly half of them had been sexually abused in Muslim Egypt—a
figure of 45% compared to the United States figures of 24%.
If available estimates apply generally, then worldwide over 1,000 million people experienced sexual abuse as youngsters.
For child abuse to be so extensive the medical and psychological
professions must have colluded besides the legal system. The Kinsey
Reports, published in two books by Alfred Kinsey, helped spark the "sexual revolution". It's now claimed that:
Kinsey obtained photos and film of children engaged in sexual acts from
adults who had had sex with them. Kinsey never notified the law of the
existence of any of these paedophiles. (Wildavsky, 1997)
The paedophile movement often quotes Kinsey in its effort to get
paedophilia accepted as a valid sexual orientation. (Reisman &
Eichel 1990)
Most child sexual abuse occurs in the home but there’s also child prostitution:
The UN Children's Fund (UNICEF) estimates there are at least one million child prostitutes in Asia alone… The agency says 300,000 children are involved in prostitution in the
United States. It estimates one million children join the ranks of the
sexually exploited each year globally. (The Weekend Australian 1996)
Consequences to victims of sexual abuse include lifelong emotional
problems, damaged sexual development, pregnancy, sexually transmitted
disease, low self esteem, depression, poor school results, prostitution
and criminal conduct. If 1 billion people are affected the financial
costs to society must be incredible.
CHURCH COVER-UP
There is a clerical culture of protection of clergy and the
institution. Many child-abusing priests were forgiven by bishops and
reassigned to another parish.
Most priests work well with parents who respect them and happily
entrust their children to them. Priests are also in positions of power
and moral authority. They can define right and wrong and tell a child,
"It's OK. It's only a sin if you tell anyone." The result has been
extraordinary betrayals. One priest of 50 years in Victoria is
estimated to have abused 2000 children commencing in 1946. Church
leaders knew but took no action:
But the scandal is not
just about the abuse… it's the conspiracy in the church hierarchy to
hide it. When confronted by victims, the church practice has been to
pay
compensation—hundreds of millions of dollars—in exchange for silence.
Then it allowed some priests to continue their crimes, sacrificing
children for the church's reputation. (Eccleston, 2002)
Cardinal Bernard Law of Boston, America's most powerful Catholic,
shared in the cover-up. In 1997 he supported one priest's bid to run a
guesthouse housing teenagers — a priest known to approve of incest,
paedophilia and bestiality and who had abuse allegations stretching
back to 1960s.
In May Cardinal Law repudiated one financial settlement reached with
Church victims of abuse because new cases threatened the Church’s
ability to meet escalating payouts.
The evidence is that in every American diocese Cardinals knew of child abuse by priests and did nothing.
Rainbow Sash, an organization promoting homosexual rights, is using the
scandal as leverage in its campaign for Church acceptance. The abuse
scandal has weakened the Catholic Church's moral authority in every
area.
THE BIBLE
An excuse some church officials use is that they had no guidelines
regarding sexual abuse of children. Canon Law (1917; revised 1983) has
only one clause against paedophilia:
A cleric who has offended…with a minor under the age of sixteen years,
is to be punished with just penalties, not excluding dismissal from the
clerical state if the case so warrants. (Book VI, Clause 1395)
The "just penalties" were left up to the bishops.
Was there no other guidance? The basis and sourcebook of Christianity
is The Bible. The Bible does not have the words "child abuse" or "paedophilia". However, it does say:
In everything do to others as you would have them do to you… (Matthew 7:12)
“You shall love your neighbour as yourself.” Love does no wrong to a
neighbour; therefore love is the fulfilling of the law. (Romans 13:8-10)
Both these Scriptures clearly rule-out child abuse.
The Bible teaches:
But now I am writing to you not to associate with anyone who bears the
name of brother or sister who is sexually immoral... Do not even eat
with such a one... Drive out the wicked person among you. (1
Corinthians 5:9-13)
The Bible does not distinguish an "age of consent". Sexual
immorality — including premarital sex, homosexual practise, prostitution,
sexual abuse of children or of adults, bestiality, etc—are wrong
irrespective of age. Immoral, child-abusing clerics should be removed
from their positions and association with them ended — "Drive out the
wicked person…"
What about the excuse that church leaders were not aware child abusers
would re-offend? It’s a common observation that anyone who gets away
with wrongdoing feels rewarded by getting away and will likely
re-offend:
Because sentence against an evil deed is not executed speedily, the human heart is fully set to do evil. (Ecclesiastes 8:11)
We see this principle at work in thievery, drink-driving, lying,
drug-trafficking, gambling, adultery, etc. Unless stopped by force
perpetrators often continue. Church authorities therefore knew from
observation and The Bible that many child abusers would re-offend
unless stopped.
What about bribing victims of abuse to keep quiet? Bible statements on bribery mainly concern judges and rulers who take bribes:
Surely oppression makes the wise foolish, and a bribe corrupts the heart. (Ecclesiastes 6:7)
Those who walk blamelessly…do not take a bribe against the innocent. (Psalm 15:2-5)
The wicked accept a concealed bribe to pervert the ways of justice. (Proverbs 17:23)
Your princes are rebels and companions of thieves. Everyone loves a bribe and runs after gifts. (Isaiah 1:23)
The Bible reasons for opposing bribery — "corrupts the heart" and
"pervert the ways of justice" — are also true of "hush money" paid to
sexual-abuse victims or their parents. Furthermore, Jesus foretold a
time when every secret is revealed (Matthew 10:26) and if this is
believed it's incompatible with paying "hush-money".
Secrecy associated with child abuse usually also requires disobeying the commands to be truthful:
Do not lie to one another… (Colossians 3:9
Deceit is in the mind of those who plan evil… (Proverbs 12:20)
Bishops who acquitted child-hurting priests and so subjected children to further hurt ignored this proverb:
One who justifies the wicked and one who condemns the righteous are both alike an abomination to the LORD. (Proverbs 17:15)
The Bible also teaches obedience to governing authorities whenever the laws of God are not compromised:
Let every person be subject to the governing authorities… (Romans 13)
Therefore every child-abusing priest should have been reported to the police in every country with laws against child-abuse.
The Bible uses children as examples of innocence. That's why it calls
adult Christians "beloved children", "little children", "children of
light", "children of God" and "obedient children":
Like obedient children, do not be conformed to the desires that you
formerly had in ignorance. Instead, as he who called you is holy, be
holy yourselves in all your conduct; for it is written, “You shall be
holy, for I am holy.” (1 Peter 1:14-16)
Forcing shame, guilt and sex on children is inconsistent with them being examples of innocence to adults.
Jesus taught:
Truly I tell you, unless you change and become like children, you will
never enter the kingdom of heaven… Whoever welcomes one such child in
my name welcomes me. (Matthew 18:4)
Sexually abused children usually reject the religion wherein they were abused. They no longer feel "welcome" in Jesus' name:
If any of you put a stumbling block before one of these little ones who
believe in me, it would be better for you if a great millstone were
hung around your neck and you were thrown into the sea. (Mark 9:42)
UNMARRIED SEX HARMFUL
John H Williams (#84) interpreted my quote from Revelation 21:8 as
"let's scare people into believing". However, he's wrong. It reads:
But as for the cowardly, the faithless, the polluted, as for murderers,
fornicators, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars, their lot shall be in
the lake that burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death.
Some commands in the Bible applied temporarily to a few people. Jesus'
command to Peter to walk on the water, for example, applied to one
person on one occasion.
Other commands are intended universally. Whether there really will be
eternal punishment is irrelevant in the present discussion. I cited
Revelation 21:8 not to "scare" – since to unbelievers it would be an
empty threat – but to establish that in the Bible sexual immorality
(fornication) is permanently, not temporarily, prohibited.
Furthermore, the ethics and commands in the Bible are for the benefit
of humankind. They are intended to promote the goods everyone values
but often fails to achieve such as long life, health, peace, sound
mind, good relationships, happiness and prosperity:
Hear, my son and accept my words,
That the years of you life may be many…
For they are life to him who finds them,
And healing to all his flesh. (Proverbs 4:10, 22)
Their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural, and the men
likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with
passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and
receiving in their own persons the due penalty for their error. (Romans
1:26-27)
Shun immorality. Every other sin a man commits is outside the body; but the immoral man sins against his own body.
(1 Corinthians 6:18)
Therefore many values taught in the Bible are scientifically testable
by testing whether they promote life, health and peaceful
relationships. Consider, for example, "Abstain from immorality". Sexual
immorality killed over 200 million people in the 20th century and led
to even more abortions — compared to about 150 million deaths by all
20th-century wars. Around 1990 the World Health Organization estimated
sexually transmitted disease at 250 million cases per year. Hence my
comment — "more devastation than all wars combined…" (#83 p. 5) Scenes of
bombed cities and destroyed military equipment portray the waste of
war. The cost of immorality is less vividly seen because it's ongoing
and built into the cost of daily life and of running societies.
AIDS alone now takes 3 million lives per year. Initially AIDS was
spread by sexual immorality — heterosexual and homosexual. Six million
new HIV infections now occur annually. Life expectancy in 35 African
countries is decreasing. In part it's a gift from the West:
The sexual revolution of the 1960s and 1970s in the West spread
globally and penetrated Africa. Some of the traditional and very sound
cultural constraints that were present to curb promiscuity were broken
down. (Morgan, 2000)
As argued in Investigator 48, sexual relations without enforceable
responsibility and commitment weakens the emotional bonding process and
mutual adaptations necessary for stable relationships. Premarital sex
is, therefore, the first step to breaking up and hence to problems that
often accompany (or augment) breaking-up such as anger, violence,
adultery, suicide, psychiatric illnesses, financial distress, murder,
depression and child abuse.
The authors of The Myth of Safe Sex (1993) foresee a time when the
survival of society will require making non-marital sex illegal and
jailing publishers of pornographic magazines.
Williams rightly says that Australians should obey the law against
child abuse but he's wrong in claiming the Bible is irrelevant. Modern
Australia with its laws has existed two centuries and like all
societies it will eventually end. The Bible, however, spans time, place
and language and offers guidance to all humankind.
Furthermore, with adultery and defacto, bisexual and homosexual
relationships now acceptable perhaps child abuse will eventually also
be accepted as a lawful, "natural orientation" and experts present
"safe" ways to do it. After all, it was lawful in ancient Greece.
People who disapprove might then face labels like "paedophobes" and
"paedophobia". If so the Bible’s guidance to the contrary will still be
here.
The scandalous thing in all this is the betrayal by "Christians" who
ignored their Christian role of being examples of right conduct. Back
in 1993 the director of South Australia’s Sexual Offenders Treatment
and Assessment Program complained that the churches ignored the law and
his treatment program. He said, "In my opinion the churches are
harboring child abusers by not sending them to us for treatment."
(Church, 1993)
EVERYONE WRONG
The Bible teaches that every teaching, every individual and every
authority contrary to God will be proven wrong and fail and eventually
pass away:
No wisdom, no understanding, no counsel, can avail against the LORD. (Proverbs 21:30)
We see this in the defeat of ancient idolatry, the demise of the Roman
Empire, the decline of slavery and polygamy, the defeat of Nazism and
Communism, the deaths of millions from immorality, the Bible’s many
victories in conflicts with science, and currently in religions facing
bankruptcy for child abuse. A copy of The Bible may cost only $10 but
principles taught therein are worth $billions! In April the Pope
declared:
People need to know that there is no place in the priesthood for those
who would harm the young. Such abuse is by every standard wrong and is
rightly considered a crime by society. It is also an appalling sin in
the eyes of God.
Human laws change and societies and governments pass away. The Bible,
however, teaches values and beliefs that promote human good and which
therefore endure and eventually prevail.
References:
Ankerberg, J. & Weldon, J. 1993 The Myth of Safe Sex. Moody Press, Chicago. p.163.
Briggs, F. Sexual Abuse of Children: the frightening truth. The Advertiser (Saturday Review), July 20, 1985, p. 8.
Briggs, F. 1986. Child Sexual Abuse. Pitman, Australia. p.12.
Burns, R. E. 1994. The Wrath of Allah. A. Ghosh, USA. p. 136.
Canon Law: www.ourladyswarriors.org/canon
Church, J. Fallen 'angels'. Sunday Mail, April 4, 1993, p. 132.
Eccleston, R. Priest was evil one, says cover-up victim. The Weekend Australian, April 20-21, 2002, p. 16.
Haynes, A. Child Molesting. Reader's Digest, May 1995, pp. 39-44.
James, C. Sins of Silence. The Advertiser, March 23, 2002, p. 65.
Kelly, P. Dirty little secret’s out. The Weekend Australian, May 18, 2002.
Mawyer, M. 1987. Silent Shame. Crossway Books, USA.
Merriman, J. Few recognize full extent of child abuse. Sunday Mail, May 6, 2001, p.18.
Morgan, T.C. Sexual Revolution Speeds Spread of HIV Among Africans. Christianity Today, February 1, 2000, p. 39.
NRSV Reference Bible. 1993. Zondervan Bible Publishers, USA.
Reisman, J. A. & Eichel, E.W. 1990. Kinsey, Sex and Fraud. Lochinvar, USA. pp. 4, 205-214
The Weekend Australian, April 20-21, 1996, p. 9.
Wildavsky, R. Sex, Lies and the Kinsey Reports. Reader's Digest, July 1997, pp. 125-130.