Three articles appear below: 1 Hornets 2 Hornets – An Analysis of A's Argument 3 Military Hornets Plausible HORNETS Anonymous (Investigator 113, 2007
March) MILITARY HORNETS
When the Israelites invaded the "Promised Land" they had help: "I will send hornets before you which shall drive out the Hivite." (Exodus 23:28) The Bible critics G. W. Foote and W. P. Ball (1921) referred to this as "military hornets" and called it a "Bible Absurdity". BIOLOGY
Bees, wasps and hornets belong to the Order Hymenoptera (membranous, winged insects). Unlike bees, which siphon nectar from flowers, hornets are carnivorous. They are 4cm long – five times as big as bees – can fly 40 miles per day, and have a stinger 7mm long. Unlike bees, which sting once and die, hornets can sting repeatedly. A few hornets raiding a beehive can kill thousands of bees. Hornet venom also breaks down human tissue and is life threatening. Four species occur in
Palestine including
the deserts by the Dead Sea. Two of these species nest underground or
among
rocks. The other two build large, round nests suspended from trees or
shrubs.
KILLER HORNETS
Hornets kill forty people yearly in Japan with further attacks in Brazil and other countries. In the Australian ABC TV
program Foreign
Correspondent (May 6, 2003) Mark Simkin reported on "Killer
Hornets".
In Japan these are eaten – "It tastes like prawn" – and brewed into
"hornet
sake", a drink which gives athletes extra energy.
The television program
continued:
SIMKIN: The hornets are
ferocious killers.
A handful of the creatures can slaughter an entire hive of bees in a
matter
of minutes. Their venom is powerful enough to dissolve human flesh.
They
kill 40 people each year.
Misao Inoue knows that better than most. Last year, her husband was picking mushrooms in the Nagano countryside when he stumbled across a hornet nest. The 61 year old was stung twice and was dead within a few hours. MILITARY HORNETS If a nest of hornets is
disturbed they quickly
become active and descend on the source in large numbers. Herds of
cattle
or horses in this situation will stampede.
G. S. Cansdale (1970)
writes:
An ancient
army lured so as
to march through
hornets-nests and attacked by thousands of furious hornets might well
degenerate
into a fleeing rabble. The Bible does not describe this, but it does
mention
that two Amorite kings were defeated for Israel by hornets.
(Deuteronomy
7:20; Joshua 24:12)
The Bible statement
dismissed by Foote and
Ball as "military hornets" and "absurdity" is probably literal and also
plausible.
REFERENCES: Cansdale, G. S. 1970 Animals of Bible Lands, Paternoster Press. Foote, G. W. and Ball, W. P. 1921 The Bible Handbook For Free Thinkers and Inquiring Christians, Pioneer press, p. 63. Hornets –
Kirk Straughen (Investigator 114, 2007 May)
In Investigator No. 113 Anonymous attempts to make a credible case for certain passages of Scripture, claiming they are "probably literal and also plausible." (p. 47) Is this conclusion
justifiable? First, let
us consider the passages under consideration, which are as follows (in
the RSV):
* And I will send
hornets before you, which
shall drive out Hivite and Canaanite, and Hittite from before you.
(Exodus
23:28) * Moreover the Lord your
God will send hornets
among them, until those who are left and hide themselves from you are
destroyed.
(Deuteronomy 7:20) * And I sent the hornet
before you, which
drove them out before you, the two kings of the Amorites; it was not by
your sword or by your bow. (Joshua 24:12)
Anonymous suggests that an army lured through a nest of hornets might "degenerate into fleeing rabble." Who, then, is doing the luring? A logical answer would be the Israelites who are advancing into the Promised Land. However, the above passages of Scripture make it quite clear that it is God who is sending the hornets.
If these passages of
Scripture are to be
considered both literal and plausible, then we would need proof that
there
exists a god capable of performing these actions.
Unfortunately, Anonymous has offered no such proof. Secondly, we would need
independent verification
from other ancient records confirming that the Canaanites and so on
were
in fact defeated by such means. Again, Anonymous has offered no such
proof.
Therefore, Anonymous' claim concerning the literalness and plausibility of these passages of Scripture is not justifiable. MILITARY HORNETS PLAUSIBLE (Investigator
115, 2007
July)
When the Israelites invaded Canaan they had help, says the Old Testament, from hornets. In response
to a 1921
reference which called
the idea of "military hornets" an "absurdity" I showed that:
1. Hornets
are dangerous
and kill people
every year, in Japan alone about forty;
2. Bees are
less
dangerous than hornets
and only 1/5 the size, but have been used in warfare in recent
centuries.
Based on these two facts I concluded that the biblical statements are plausible rather than "absurdity". (#113) Mr Straughen (#114) makes the further objections that:1. We do not have independent records of any Canaanites being defeated by military use of hornets; We do not need confirming records from Canaanites since I merely argued that hornets as a weapon are "plausible" – I did not say it's historically confirmed. That it's "plausible" is shown by the modern-day examples of the military use of bees. The "LORD's"
involvement
we cannot presently
test. When I investigate the Bible I "test what is testable" and
supernatural
input cannot be tested.
Anonymous
|